Virtue Signaling: Anti-Gun Debate

It's about the most obvious thing in the world now. Anti-Gun virtue signaling that tells of people surrendering their firearms after a tragedy, after someone abuses a tool with malicious intent, it's all the rage...except..it's played out. We get it. You bought a gun for whatever reason, but, never intended on using it, and then surrendered it when someone else was irresponsible with it. That's not a gun owner. That's a bandwagoner and it's high time we hold them accountable for their bullshit.If someone purchases a firearm and then amidst a tragedy says something to the effect of "I'm glad this gun won't harm anyone," then you're an idiot. Guns were made to harm. But again...for like the umpteenth thousandth time, it's a tool. Not seeing the crowds of people turning in their cars for destruction because others get DUIs and then say some dumb shit like "I'm glad my car will never kill anyone." We get it. They jumped on a bandwagon and didn't fully understand the ramifications of firearm ownership. Then they get on a soapbox and proclaim that nobody "needs" guns like this, millions of people flock to their cause despite the fact that they're the gun forfeiting equivalent of fedora-wearing neckbeards dropping m'lady at the start of every sentence. We get it. They need attention.Time everyone who hates their guns to put their money where their mouth is. People use $20 bills to rip coke. People have used screwdrivers, hammers and lumber to kill harm and maim. Warlords in third world countries use food to hold power over the people in their nations. Drunks drive cars and kill people. People have committed murder via drowning. Medical malpractice is a thing as well.So as soon as those giving up their guns are willing to give up their money, screwdrivers, hammers, lumber, food, cars, and water...we'll take the anti-gun virtue signaling about as seriously as we take the advice on the economy from Communists.